Comments on: An alternative definition for Data.List.groupBy http://coder.bsimmons.name/blog/2010/02/an-alternative-definition-for-datalistgroupby/ fragmentary ideas ䷿ intellectual what-nots ䷷ and haskell programming ䷴ Mon, 16 Aug 2010 13:21:24 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: The Definition of Data.List.group | LAMBDAPHONE http://coder.bsimmons.name/blog/2010/02/an-alternative-definition-for-datalistgroupby/comment-page-1/#comment-205 The Definition of Data.List.group | LAMBDAPHONE Thu, 11 Feb 2010 04:43:17 +0000 http://coder.bsimmons.name/blog/?p=318#comment-205 [...] EDIT: see also an alternative definition for Data.List.groupBy [...]

blockquote {
margin: 2em;
padding: .1em 1.5em;
position: relative;
background: #2F2F2F;
}
">

[...] EDIT: see also an alternative definition for Data.List.groupBy [...]

]]> By: jberryman http://coder.bsimmons.name/blog/2010/02/an-alternative-definition-for-datalistgroupby/comment-page-1/#comment-204 jberryman Thu, 11 Feb 2010 04:41:25 +0000 http://coder.bsimmons.name/blog/?p=318#comment-204 Yusaku, thanks for commenting and pointing out the error! I think that was a bad copy and paste job. Fixed now. Yusaku, thanks for commenting and pointing out the error! I think that was a bad copy and paste job. Fixed now.

]]> By: Yusaku Hashimoto http://coder.bsimmons.name/blog/2010/02/an-alternative-definition-for-datalistgroupby/comment-page-1/#comment-203 Yusaku Hashimoto Thu, 11 Feb 2010 02:22:19 +0000 http://coder.bsimmons.name/blog/?p=318#comment-203 Great Article. But the type of groupBy' can be (a -> a -> Bool) -> [a] -> [[a]] (I removed context). You may want to use groupBy' on non-Eq lists. Great Article.

But the type of groupBy’ can be (a -> a -> Bool) -> [a] -> [[a]] (I removed context). You may want to use groupBy’ on non-Eq lists.

]]>