<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some initial tests of Tries</title>
	<atom:link href="http://coder.bsimmons.name/blog/2009/04/some-initial-tests-of-tries/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://coder.bsimmons.name/blog/2009/04/some-initial-tests-of-tries/</link>
	<description>fragmentary ideas  ䷿  intellectual what-nots  ䷷  and haskell programming  ䷴</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 21:36:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Initial tests of Tries: Follow Up - LAMBDAPHONE</title>
		<link>http://coder.bsimmons.name/blog/2009/04/some-initial-tests-of-tries/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Initial tests of Tries: Follow Up - LAMBDAPHONE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 20:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coder.bsimmons.name/blog/?p=96#comment-26</guid>
		<description>[...] is to wrap up my previous post about Tries and my attempts at an implementation, and to summarize some of the things I think I learned about [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="color: #E8E8E8;</p>
<p>blockquote {<br />
        margin: 2em;<br />
        padding: .1em 1.5em;<br />
        position: relative;<br />
        background: #2F2F2F;<br />
}<br />
">
<p>[...] is to wrap up my previous post about Tries and my attempts at an implementation, and to summarize some of the things I think I learned about [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jberryman</title>
		<link>http://coder.bsimmons.name/blog/2009/04/some-initial-tests-of-tries/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>jberryman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coder.bsimmons.name/blog/?p=96#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Another update. I realized that the Value field in Data.Map is not strict like I was assuming. This might be giving Data.Map an edge in this test.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another update. I realized that the Value field in Data.Map is not strict like I was assuming. This might be giving Data.Map an edge in this test.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jberryman</title>
		<link>http://coder.bsimmons.name/blog/2009/04/some-initial-tests-of-tries/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>jberryman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 19:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coder.bsimmons.name/blog/?p=96#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Updated post with results of testing association lists, vs Data.Maps vs. simple unbalanced binary trees for storing branches. The small input text had 17,000+ words. Maybe it would be interesting to see at what point unbalanced trees or lists become more efficient.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Updated post with results of testing association lists, vs Data.Maps vs. simple unbalanced binary trees for storing branches. The small input text had 17,000+ words. Maybe it would be interesting to see at what point unbalanced trees or lists become more efficient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Magnus Jonsson</title>
		<link>http://coder.bsimmons.name/blog/2009/04/some-initial-tests-of-tries/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Magnus Jonsson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coder.bsimmons.name/blog/?p=96#comment-23</guid>
		<description>jberryman, I don&#039;t think ghci does very many optimizations, so you may be giving yourself a harder challenge than necessary. Data.Map would lose against itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jberryman, I don&#8217;t think ghci does very many optimizations, so you may be giving yourself a harder challenge than necessary. Data.Map would lose against itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: augustss</title>
		<link>http://coder.bsimmons.name/blog/2009/04/some-initial-tests-of-tries/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>augustss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 08:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coder.bsimmons.name/blog/?p=96#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Never use ghci for testing performance.  Use compilation with optimization.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never use ghci for testing performance.  Use compilation with optimization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
